Legal Opinion
Kerman v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
Decided March 8, 2011No. Docket No. 15894-06UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARK AND LUCY KERMAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Kerman v. Comm'r
Docket No. 15894-06.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2011-54; 2011 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 52; 101 T.C.M. (CCH) 1241;
March 8, 2011, Filed
Kerman v. Chenery Assocs., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60258 (W.D. Ky., Aug. 14, 2007)
Decision will be entered for respondent.
Scott R. Cox and Brennan S. Cox, for petitioners.
Mark D. Eblen and Dessa J. Baker-Inman, for respondent.
GOEKE, Judge.
GOEKE
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GOEKE, Judge: During 2000 Mark and Lucy Kerman sold 132,897 shares of Kenmark Optical, Inc. (Kenmark) stock,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Neal Crispin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Rovakat, LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011
- Curtis Inv. Co., LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2017
- G.D. Parker, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
- Putanec v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.