Legal Opinion

Neal Crispin v. Commissioner of Internal Reven

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 25, 2013No. 12-2275PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JORDAN, Circuit Judge.

Neal D. Crispin appeals the decision of the United States Tax Court that he was not entitled to an ordinary loss deduction for his participation in a Custom Adjustable Rate Debt Structure (“CARDS”) transaction and that he is liable for an accuracy-related penalty under § 6662 of the Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”). 1 The Tax Court disallowed the claimed loss on the grounds that Crispin’s CARDS transaction lacked economic substance and held that he could not avoid the penalty because he had not relied reasonably or in good faith on the advice of an…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bixby v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  2. United States v. TomkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Commissioner v. LoBueSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Commissioner v. TuftsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. David E. Heasley and Kathleen Heasley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blum v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Guy R. Baxter v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  3. Curtis Inv. Co., LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2017
  4. Putanec v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
  5. David B. Greenberg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API