Legal Opinion
Lake v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 19, 2005No. 32052-5-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
110 P.3d 806 (2005)
Adina LAKE, a single person, Appellant
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurer, Respondent.
No. 32052-5-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
April 19, 2005.
Gailann Y. Stargardter, Barrett & Worden, P.S., Pamela A. Okano, Reed McClure, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
Gary Williams, Attorney at Law, Port Angeles, WA, for Appellant.
MORGAN, J.
¶ 1 The question in this case is whether a four-wheel all terrain vehicle (ATV) is a "motor driven cycle." The trial court answered yes, and so do we. Thus, we affirm.
¶ 2 On August 10, 2001, Adina Lake was a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Kitsap County v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Kitsap County v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Kish v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morris v. PALOUSE RIVER & COULEE CITY RRCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Morris v. Palouse River & Coulee City RailroadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Economy Preferred Insurance Company v. RodgersDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019