Legal Opinion
United States v. William Henry Sockel
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 4, 1973No. 72-1716PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHES, Chief Judge.
Finding no merit in appellant’s three contentions of error, we affirm his conviction for interstate transportation of a stolen firearm, knowing it had been stolen, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(i) and 924(a).
The evidence stands unchallenged and, in brief, presented these facts. On January 5, 1971, during the course of interrogation of appellant and other individuals by Kansas City, Kansas, police officers, appellant by use of a gun taken from his coat, disarmed two of the police officers, re-entered the automobile in which he had been riding at the time he was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. HandySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Eddie B. Kleven and Maynard W. Maetzold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Aetna Insurance Company v. Barnett Brothers, Incorporated, Barnett Brothers, Incorporated, Cross-Appellant v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- David Victor Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jordan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Steven John AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. GillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Joseph Armand OliverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Reginald Cochran, William Ronald Watson, and William Robert Bland,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.