Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 6, 2001No. AC 18365PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Duane Clark, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53U-217C.1 On appeal,2 the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) admitted evidence of uncharged misconduct, (2) allowed the state to exclude a member of the defendant’s racial group from the jury and (3) instructed the jury that it could not speculate regarding the effect that a witness’ *184admitted use of marijuana had on the witness’ ability to see and comprehend the events. We affirm…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. AsheConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- People v. SamuelsColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.