York v. Strong
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J .
Kathleen Strong appeals from an order denying her motion for postjudgment attorney fees incurred in enforcing a judgment for fees awarded for her successful defense of a SLAPP suit (strategic lawsuit against public participation) (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16; all further statutory references are to this code).
Strong argues she was entitled to such a fee award pursuant to section 685.040, which authorizes an award for enforcement of judgments not only where provided for in a contract, but also in cases where such fees are “otherwise provided by law.” (§ 685.040.)
We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Conservatorship of McQueenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Chinese Yellow Pages Co. v. Chinese Overseas Marketing Service Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Briggs v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Flores v. Sharp Grossmont Hospital CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Sayta v. MartinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022