Legal Opinion

York v. Strong

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 2015No. G049778PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J .

Kathleen Strong appeals from an order denying her motion for postjudgment attorney fees incurred in enforcing a judgment for fees awarded for her successful defense of a SLAPP suit (strategic lawsuit against public participation) (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16; all further statutory references are to this code).

Strong argues she was entitled to such a fee award pursuant to section 685.040, which authorizes an award for enforcement of judgments not only where provided for in a contract, but also in cases where such fees are “otherwise provided by law.” (§ 685.040.)

We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Conservatorship of McQueenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Chinese Yellow Pages Co. v. Chinese Overseas Marketing Service Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Briggs v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. Flores v. Sharp Grossmont Hospital CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Sayta v. MartinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API