Legal Opinion

Janowsky v. Parsons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 13, 1955PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the decision of Special Term that the complaints must be dismissed. We do not deem it necessary to comment further on the conclusion reached by Special Term that section 1526 of the Education Law violates no constitutional right of the appellants. Further citation of authorities is unnecessary to sustain the conclusion that section 1526 does not offend the Constitution either because the voters of City School District No. 9 of the City of Corning were not permitted to vote or because there was an unconstitutional delegation of legislative powers to the Commissioner of Education.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Gardner v. GintherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Gardner v. GintherNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Utica v. Water Pollution Control BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Guariglia v. De FurioNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. Texaco, Inc.Nassau County District Court · 1975
  4. Claim of Gormeley v. New York Daily NewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Ogden v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API