Legal Opinion

Hinze v. City of Iola

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1914No. 18,767PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court; Oscar Foust,. judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the city for damages received by an electric shock in his place of business. He alleged that the city was operating a light plant and supplying its citizens with, electricity for lights; that over the wires strung upon the poles on the streets and alleys a current approximating 2200 voltage was passed while only about 110 voltage was required for lights for each consumer; that, along the main light wires were installed transformers consisting of iron boxes in which were placed coils of' insulated wire…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Morrow v. County Commissioners of Saline CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  3. Winegarner v. Edison Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Metropolitan Street-railway Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Croan v. BadenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Tarin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Seely v. Board of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Snook v. City of WinfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. State Bank v. HarfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API