Hinze v. City of Iola
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Allen district court; Oscar Foust,. judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
West, J.:
The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the city for damages received by an electric shock in his place of business. He alleged that the city was operating a light plant and supplying its citizens with, electricity for lights; that over the wires strung upon the poles on the streets and alleys a current approximating 2200 voltage was passed while only about 110 voltage was required for lights for each consumer; that, along the main light wires were installed transformers consisting of iron boxes in which were placed coils of' insulated wire…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Morrow v. County Commissioners of Saline CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
- Winegarner v. Edison Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Metropolitan Street-railway Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Croan v. BadenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Tarin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Seely v. Board of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Snook v. City of WinfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- State Bank v. HarfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.