Legal Opinion

Zedot Constr. v. Red Sullivan's Air Serv.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 2006No. 1041944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Zedot Construction, Inc., appeals from the Jefferson Circuit Court's denial of Zedot's motion to compel arbitration.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Zedot, acting as general contractor on a construction project in Jefferson County, entered into a subcontract with Red Sullivan's Conditioned Air Services, Inc. ("CAS"), under which CAS was to perform certain work on the project. The subcontract contained an arbitration clause.

Because, according to Zedot, CAS's work on the project was deficient, Zedot terminated CAS and hired a new subcontractor. On January 20, 2005, CAS sued Zedot in the Jefferson…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,406 R. Stockton Rush, III v. Oppenheimer & Co., and Scott SeskisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Arthur H. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CIGNA FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC., Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Companion Life Ins. Co. v. Whitesell Mfg., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ex Parte Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Paragon Ltd., Inc. v. BolesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. SouthTrust Bank v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  4. O'Neal v. Bama Exterminating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  5. Norvell v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API