Sindle v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed: “This is a workmen’s compensation case. The Passaic County Court of Common Pleas on a trial de novo affirmed an award for compensation made by the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau. The certiorari was issued to review a judgment based on that award.
Read the full summary
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed: “This is a workmen’s compensation case. The Passaic County Court of Common Pleas on a trial de novo affirmed an award for compensation made by the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau. The certiorari was issued to review a judgment based on that award. There are several reasons assigned for setting aside the award, 'but the view we take of the case renders it unnecessary to discuss but one, viz., we find no evidence of dependency in the record, within the rulings of our courts. Jackson v. Erie Railroad Co., 86 N. J. L.…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee CueiajU.
The judgment under review herein should, be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
*555For a-ffirmance — Tira Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bergen, Heepeniieiaier, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 6.
For reversal—Treno hard, Parker, Minturn, Ackeeson, Van Buskiek, JJ. 5.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Clary v. Borough of EatontownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Wolf v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust. of Park RidgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Wagner v. Mayor, Etc., City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- B. v. O.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.