Legal Opinion

McFarlan v. McFarlan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1909No. Docket No. 26PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Antrim; Mayne, J. Petition by Mary McFarlan for the removal of Euphemia McFarlan as administratrix of the estate of Henry C. McFarlan, deceased. The petition was granted and respondent appealed to the circuit court. There was judgment sustaining the order of the probate court, and respondent brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This was a proceeding commenced in the probate court upon the petition of Mary McFarlan for the removal of the respondent. An order was entered in the probate court removing her. From that order she took an appeal to the circuit court. The case was heard in the circuit court without a jury, and a finding of facts and law made. The court found that the petitioner presented a claim to the probate court, and obtained its allowance, from which no appeal was taken; that the estate of Henry C. McFarlan, deceased, was insolvent; that petitioner was the only creditor of the estate; that she claims *654in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manning v. DrakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Marshall v. BlassMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morgan v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Buck v. LockwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Gingles v. Savings BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Terry v. TerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Fry v. FrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API