Legal Opinion

Glou v. Security Benefit Ass'n

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1934No. Appeal 26PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Parker, J.,

The defendant has appealed from a judgment for the plaintiff, the beneficiary in a fraternal benefit certificate issued by defendant, and has assigned as errors the refusal' of defendant’s request for binding instructions and its motion for judgment n. o. v. There are no assignments of error directed to the admission of evidence or to the instructions contained in the charge of the trial judge, save only the refusal to give binding instructions for the defendant. The ultimate question involved is, therefore, whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. March v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Suravitz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Achenbach v. StoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Guilinger v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Livingood v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bristol v. Commercial Union Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Szidor v. Greek Catholic UnionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Cohen v. Boslover Beneficial Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Ondo v. Greek Catholic UnionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Pisko v. First Catholic Slovak UnionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API