Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1978No. 3387PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals his convictions of kidnapping, criminal sexual penetration in the second degree and armed robbery. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. The issues involve: (1) admission of a collateral offense; and (2) pretrial admission of evidence.

Admission of Collateral Offense

Evidence Rule 404(b) authorizes the admission of other crimes, acts and wrongs to prove, among other things, identity. “Whenever the proof of another act or crime tends to prove the guilt of the person on trial, it is admissible, notwithstanding the consequences to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. BellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State v. LindseyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. HutchinsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. PetersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Neely v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API