Legal Opinion
Paraka v. University of Rochester
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 6, 2015No. 13-CV-6483LPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lilia Paraka brings this action against her former employer, the University of Rochester (“University”), and her former supervisor, Tammy Terrana, alleging that she was terminated from her employment based on her age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. and the New York State Human Rights Law (“HRL”), N.Y Exec. Law § 290 et seq. Defendants have moved for summary judgment dismissing • plaintiffs claims. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted, and the complaint…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anglin v. WilkieDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2025
- Hopkins v. McDonoughDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024