Legal Opinion

Catto v. Maxey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 22, 1935No. 22826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties will be re ferred to as they appeared in the trial court, the plaintiffs in error as defendants, the defendant in error as plaintiff.

The defendants appeal from a judgment of the district court of Canadian county, pursuant to a verdict in favor of plaintiff.

There were other defendants sued by plaintiff, but judgment was obtained against only the defendants named above.

The petition filed alleges, among other things, that the defendant Pearl Brooks, a nurse, drove and operated an automobile belonging to her codefendant, Wm. B. Cat-to, her employer, and that while driving said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Anderson v. CardwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joyce O'connor, as Administratrix of the Estate of Benedict O'connor, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Belford v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Wray v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API