Legal Opinion

Reither v. Murdock

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1901No. S.F. No. 1806PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action upon an administrator's bond against the defendant Murdock, as administrator, and the other defendants, as sureties on his bond. The appeal is taken by the defendant Whitney, one of the sureties. The action was dismissed as to the defendant Murdock, and default entered as against Frutig. The main contest in the court below, on the part of the defendant Whitney, was, that it never had been ascertained that an account of defendant Murdock, the administrator, had ever been rendered or settled by the court, and hence, as surety, he was not liable. This is also the main…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chaquette v. OrtetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Allen v. TiffanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Spencer v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cook v. CeasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Donnell v. DansbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. In Re the Guardianship of the Person & Estate of BundyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Short v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Nickals v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API