Legal Opinion

Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. Eunice Rice Milling Co

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1952No. 13907_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

Brought Jan. 5, 1949, against defendant below, appellant here, as the insurer of one LaDew under the Louisiana direct action statute, Act No. 55 of 1930, LSA-R.S. 22: 655, the suit was for the loss sustained by plaintiff in the destruction by fire of its mill and contents.

The claim was: that plaintiff had contracted with LaDew for the sale to it of an automatic sprinkler system to be designed, constructed, and installed by him in its mill, to be accepted and paid for as provided1 thereift; that the system was completed in April, 1948, and, though not fully accepted and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wells v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INS. CO.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  2. Fisher Et Ux. v. Home Indemnity CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. Wells v. IrwinDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. Eunice Rice Milling CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  2. Mobley Et Ux. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 1Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API