Legal Opinion
Fisher Et Ux. v. Home Indemnity Co
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1952No. 13810PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
Filed January 6, 1950, the suit, from the judgment in which this appeal comes, sought the recovery of damages by reason of the alleged injurious effect of consuming a product known as Westsal, between the dates of January 19, 1949, and February 20, 1949. This product was manufactured by Foster-Milburn Company, Inc., of Buffalo, New York, and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including among others and ■particularly its Westwood Pharmaceutical Division and Westwood Pharmacal Corporation, both of Buffalo, New York. The Home Indemnity Company, which is a corporation organized…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Irving Trust Co. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- West v. Monroe Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SoileauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Churchman v. IngramLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cushing v. Maryland Cas. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Rowley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1956
- Watson Et Ux. v. Employers Liability Assur. Corp., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Lewis v. Manufacturers Casualty Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1952
- Watson v. Employers Liability Assur. Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.