Legal Opinion

Elmore v. Ritter Implement Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Conr't.

Tbe bill was filed against tbe conditional vendor to recover under section 7291 of tbe Code for tbe part consideration paid on a tractor by tbe conditional vendee.

Tbe defendant’s demurrer was sustained and tbe bill dismissed. Complainant appealed and insists (1) that the chancellor erroneously held that upon default the tractor could be sold elsewhere than in Jefferson county, tbe place of sale, and repossession by tbe vendor, and (2) that be erred because tbe facts and circumstances attending repossession of tbe tractor constituted a rescisr sion of tbe…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice v. Lusky Furniture Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Johnson City Buick Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Stumb Motor Co. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seymour v. WS BOYD SALES COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Quick v. Woodward Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  3. Ham Const. Co. v. Dempster Bros.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API