Legal Opinion

Mangines v. Ermisch

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 20, 1998No. SC 15787Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

This appeal arises out of a dispute concerning the meaning and intent of the last will and testament of Catherine L. McCarthy of Southbury. At issue is the proper interpretation of article sixth of her will, which bequeaths McCarthy’s residual estate “to the Bishop of Reykiavik, (Iceland), who is presently the *511Most Reverend Alfred J. Jolson, S.J., c/o Jesuit Mission Bureau, St. Joseph University, 5600 City Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19131, or his successor, for Church needs.”1 Jolson’s family and McCarthy’s family had been friends and Jolson had retained contact with McCarthy…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Val-Pak of Central Connecticut North, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Molnar v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Mangines v. ErmischConnecticut Superior Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API