Rochester-Mobile, LLC v. C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MAIN, Justice.
Rochester-Mobile, LLC, and Salzman-Mobile, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Rochester-Salzman"), appeal from a judgment entered against them in a declaratory-judgment action relating to the validity of a 25-year sublease between Rochester-Salzman and Southern Family Markets of Mobile South University BLVD, LLC ("SFM"), and C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. ("C & S"). The trial court concluded that because the sublease was not recorded pursuant to § 35-4-6, Ala. Code 1975, the sublease was void for the remainder of the term extending beyond 20 years. We reverse and remand.
I. Facts…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Tuscaloosa County Com'n v. Deputy SheriffsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Smith v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Premier Holdings of Georgia, LLC v. RRG of Jacksonville, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026
- Premier Holdings of Georgia, LLC v. RRG of Jacksonville, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026
- Trondheim Capital Partners LP v. Life Insurance Company of AlabamaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020