Legal Opinion

Rochester-Mobile, LLC v. C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 2017No. 1160185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAIN, Justice.

Rochester-Mobile, LLC, and Salzman-Mobile, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Rochester-Salzman"), appeal from a judgment entered against them in a declaratory-judgment action relating to the validity of a 25-year sublease between Rochester-Salzman and Southern Family Markets of Mobile South University BLVD, LLC ("SFM"), and C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. ("C & S"). The trial court concluded that because the sublease was not recorded pursuant to § 35-4-6, Ala. Code 1975, the sublease was void for the remainder of the term extending beyond 20 years. We reverse and remand.

I. Facts…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Tuscaloosa County Com'n v. Deputy SheriffsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Smith v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Premier Holdings of Georgia, LLC v. RRG of Jacksonville, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026
  2. Premier Holdings of Georgia, LLC v. RRG of Jacksonville, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026
  3. Trondheim Capital Partners LP v. Life Insurance Company of AlabamaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API