Legal Opinion
Buetow v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 13, 2010No. Civ. 07-3970 (RHK/JJK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This lawsuit concerns hunting clothing manufactured and/or sold by Defendants A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc. (“ALS”), Cabela’s, Inc., Cabela’s Wholesale, Inc., and Gander Mountain Co. (“Gander Mountain”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs 1 allege that Defendants have misrepresented that their clothing eliminates human odor and is capable of being “reactivated or regenerated in a household [clothes] dryer after the clothing has become saturated with odors.” (Sec. Am. Compl.(“SAC”) ¶2.) All parties now move for summary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United Industries Corp. v. Clorox Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Buetow v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Johnson v. Bobcat Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Buetow v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Buetow v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Global Traffic Technologies, LLC v. Emtrac Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013