Legal Opinion
Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 25, 1993No. Court 91-07-00530PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiff, Federal-Mogul Corporation (“Federal-Mogul”), commenced this action to challenge certain aspects of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“ITA”) final results in the first administrative review of imports of antifriction bearings (“AFBs”) from Japan. Anti-friction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From Japan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews (“Final Results”), 56 Fed.Reg. 31,754 (1991). Substantive issues raised by the parties in the underlying administrative proceeding were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Transcom, Inc., and L & S Bearing Company v. Unite States, and the Timken CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- J.S. Stone, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Micron Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Transcom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.