Legal Opinion

Harold ASCH, Appellant, v. PHILIPS, APPEL & WALDEN, INC., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 9, 1989No. 662, Dockets 87-7009, 87-7067PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from a securities fraud dispute. Judge Peter K. Leisure provided a complete account of the factual background in Baum v. Phillips, Appel & Walden, Inc., 648 F.Supp. 1518, 1521-23 (S.D.N.Y.1986). We refer the reader to Judge Leisure’s opinion and will simply summarize the facts for the purposes of this appeal.

A group of investors sued Philips, Appel & Walden (a brokerage firm), Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (the clearing agent for Philips Appel), and Harold Asch (the Philips Appel employee in charge of the plaintiffs’ accounts). The plaintiffs alleged…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Anthony IndelicatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,451 Jerry Krim, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Banctexas Group, Inc., Banctexas Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Ilya Boguslavsky v. Martin H. Kaplan and Gusrae, Kaplan & Bruno, Paul T. RussoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  4. In Re Amaranth Natural Gas Commodities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Connolly v. HavensDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API