Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Bergen v. Lawrence

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided November 1, 1985No. C85-0136-BPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRIMMER, Chief Judge.

This case arises from the contentions of the United States and plaintiff-intervenors Wyoming Wildlife Federation and National Wildlife Federation (Wildlife Federations), that defendant has wrongfully fenced in federal land in violation of the Unlawful Inclosures of Public Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. §§ 1061-1066. At the hearing on plaintiff-intervenors’ motion for preliminary injunction, with the agreement of counsel, the Court consolidated the matter into a full hearing on the merits pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a)(2).

At the conclusion of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. McKelvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. North Dakota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Leo Sheep Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Bergen v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Crow Tribe of Indians v. RepsisDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1994
  3. Iron Bar Holdings v. CapeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  4. United States v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API