Legal Opinion
Crow Tribe of Indians v. Repsis
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided October 25, 1994No. 1:92-cv-01002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING CASE
ALAN B. JOHNSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment.
The Amended Complaint seeks a declaration that the Tribe and its members, such as Mr. Ten Bear, have an unrestricted right to hunt and fish on Big Horn National Forest lands within the state of Wyoming as reserved in the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868. Plaintiffs seek declaratory judgment that plaintiffs retain their treaty-based off-reservation hunting and fishing rights on ceded, unoccupied and public lands, that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Organized Village of Kake v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Herrera v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Crow Tribe of Indians v. RepsisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Crow Tribe Of Indians v. RepsisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995