City of Muscatine v. U.S. Enviro-Con., Inc.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
Defendant, Stanley Consultants, Inc., which had cross-petitioned against third parties for indemnity or contribution in the event that it was held liable on plaintiff’s claims, appeals from the district court’s determination, following settlement of plaintiff’s claims, that defendant’s cross-petition claims have been automatically dismissed by operation of law under Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 215.1. We affirm the district court.
The dispute which gave rise to this litigation involved a wastewater treatment facility owned and operated by the City of Mus-catine. In November,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. Iowa District Court for Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Kutrules v. SuchomelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Werkmeister v. KronebergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Great Western Land & Cattle Corp. v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Koss v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ray v. Merle Hay Mall, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2000
- Ray v. Merle Hay Mall, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2000