Legal Opinion

Ray v. Merle Hay Mall, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided September 27, 2000No. 99-1367PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Judge.

Una Ray appeals the district court’s ruling denying her motion seeking relief from the operation of Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 215.1 on the dismissal of her tort action. We find her action of securing a trial date by stipulation of the parties does not operate to circumvent the required procedure under rule 215.1. This rule mandates application to the court for a continuance to avoid dismissal for failure to try a case prior to the noticed date. Therefore, the trial court did not err in overruling Ray’s motion to declare Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 215.1 inapplicable. Affirmed.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Waukon Auto Supply v. Farmers & Merchants Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. Frantz v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Windus v. Great Plains GasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  4. Rath v. SholtySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Talbot v. TalbotSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duder v. ShanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Ray v. Merle Hay Mall, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2000
  3. State of Iowa v. Jason Michael ZealCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API