Legal Opinion

Boe v. Marshall

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 27, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00184Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION BRIANNA BOE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:22-cv-184-LCB ) STEVE MARSHALL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION & ORDER Before the Court is WPATH’s1 motion (Doc. 208) to quash Defendants’ Rule 45 subpoena. Also before the Court is Defendants’ motion in limine (Doc. 220), through which Defendants seek exclusion of all WPATH-related evidence in the event the Court were to grant WPATH’s motion to quash. For the forthcoming reasons, WPATH’s motion to quash is due to be denied on its merits, and Defendants’ motion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Richard A. Farnsworth v. The Procter & Gamble Company v. Center for Disease Control, Movant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Richard Jordan v. Georgia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API