MATTER OF BENITEZ v. Llano
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Due to the concurrence of circumstances described in the opinion at the Family Court and the delays, for whatever reasons, in prosecuting this custody proceeding, the infant is within months of attaining his legal maturity, and, therefore, the legal right to choose where and with whom he will live. It would be bootless and cruel to change his custody at this time. Under the circumstances the principles applicable to children of more tender years may not be blindly applied (cf. Matter of Spence-Chapin Adoption…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Kropp v. ShepskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- In re Spence-Chapin Adoption Service v. PolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bennett v. JeffreysNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Nehra v. UhlarNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In Re the Marriage of AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Curry v. AshbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re Patricia A. W.New York City Family Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.