Legal Opinion
Queen Insurance Co. v. Hammond
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1965No. Calendar 4, Docket 50,177PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, C. J.
Plaintiff Queen Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Wayne circuit court • dismissing Its declaration as ' to defendant Edgar Hammond.
In November, 1961, appellant Queen Insurance Company, and Home Mutual Insurance Company, both foreign corporations duly admitted to do business in the State of Michigan, joined in suing Bradley McAllister and Edgar Hammond (ages 4 and 6 respectively on the date of the incident) jointly, and severally for damages allegedly caused by a fire started by defendants in the home of plaintiffs’ subrogors, Robert W. and Dolores Hunter. Damages were sought in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baker v. AltMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- McNair v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Baldinger v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Deeg v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Cogswell v. KellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. DiehlMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Boggerty v. WilsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Burhans v. WitbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Central Advertising Co. v. City of NoviMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- DeLuca v. BowdenOhio Supreme Court · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.