Legal Opinion

People v. Merrill

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1951No. Crim. 2731PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrat, J.

From a conviction of rape with force and violence and an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

Questions Presented

1. Was the prosecutrix’ testimony inherently improbable?

2. Error in exclusion of testimony?

3. Error in denying probation ?

4. Error in denying new trial ?

5. Misconduct of district attorney ?

6. Misconduct of judge ?

1. Prosecutrix’ Testimony.

Mary, aged 28, met defendant, aged 32, in September, 1949, at a garage where she kept her car and where he was employed. She saw and talked to him there frequently late at night when she came in with her car. She went out…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Riviello v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists' International Union of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. People v. SwansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API