State v. Koontz
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
41 P.3d 475 (2002)
145 Wash.2d 650
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Matthew W. KOONTZ, Petitioner.
No. 70861-4.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued October 25, 2001.
Decided March 7, 2002.
Matthew W. Koontz, Yacolt, pro se.
Suzanne Lee Elliott, Seattle, for Petitioner.
Arthur Curtis, Clark County Prosecutor, Kelli Ellen Osler, Deputy, Vancouver, for Respondent.
JOHNSON, J.
This case considers whether, and under what circumstances, a jury may review videotape recordings of trial testimony during its deliberations. The petitioner in this case was convicted of second degree assault of a minor…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Mark Kevin BinderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- State v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- United States v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. A.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- State v. MorgensenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. MorgensenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- McKesson Corp. v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- People v. DeBellaColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.