Legal Opinion

State v. Koontz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2002No. 70861-4PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

41 P.3d 475 (2002)

145 Wash.2d 650

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Matthew W. KOONTZ, Petitioner.

No. 70861-4.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued October 25, 2001.

Decided March 7, 2002.

Matthew W. Koontz, Yacolt, pro se.

Suzanne Lee Elliott, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Arthur Curtis, Clark County Prosecutor, Kelli Ellen Osler, Deputy, Vancouver, for Respondent.

JOHNSON, J.

This case considers whether, and under what circumstances, a jury may review videotape recordings of trial testimony during its deliberations. The petitioner in this case was convicted of second degree assault of a minor…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark Kevin BinderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. State v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. United States v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. A.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  2. State v. MorgensenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. MorgensenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. McKesson Corp. v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. People v. DeBellaColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API