Legal Opinion
Jeffrey Weekley v. Michael W. Moore, Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 27, 2001No. 98-4218PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and MILLS * , District Judge. RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:
In our previous Opinion in this case, we noted that “[t]he resolution of this appeal ... turns on whether a successive petition such as Weekley’s is nonetheless a ‘properly filed application’ under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2).” Weekley v. Moore, 204 F.3d 1083, 1085 (11th Cir.2000). The majority of this Court was persuaded by the reasoning of the United States Courts of Appeals for the Seventh' and Ninth Circuits 1 and concluded that successive…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Steven R. Lovasz v. Scig Supt. Donald T. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Tony Bruce Bennett v. Christopher Artuz, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Feliz Talaz Villegas v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Darnell Tinker v. Craig HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carl D. Bond v. Michael W. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Drew v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Gregory Hardy v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections, Michael W. Moore, SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Daniel Siebert v. Donal CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.