Legal Opinion

McQuivey v. International Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

H. T. Kellogg, J.:

The employer was engaged in operating a surface railroad. On or about July 1,1922, its trainmen and mechanics went out on strike. The employer engaged strikebreakers to take their places. The claimant’s husband, Edward McQuivey, was employed on the sixteenth of September, at which time the strike was still on. His *508working hours were from seven-thirty a. m. to five-thirty p. M. It became his duty to assist in painting certain railway cars of his employer which were housed in a paint shop. McQuivey, together with other painters, was permitted, though not required, to sleep in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claim of Babkees v. Electrolux Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Erdberg v. United Textile Print WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. D'Anofrio v. HattenNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Groff v. UzziliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  5. Matter of Giliotti v. Hoffman Catering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API