Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 10, 2014No. 100709988; A152469PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

In this post-conviction case, petitioner alleges that he received ineffective and inadequate assistance of counsel when his trial attorney made a statement on the record that contradicted petitioner’s own representations to the court. The post-conviction court rejected petitioner’s argument and denied the petition for relief. We affirm.

Petitioner was indicted on one count of third-degree rape and three counts of third-degree sexual abuse. Petitioner and his trial counsel signed a petition providing that petitioner would plead guilty to the third-degree rape charge and receive a downward…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lowry v. LaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. Berg v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API