Clark v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
In this post-conviction case, petitioner alleges that he received ineffective and inadequate assistance of counsel when his trial attorney made a statement on the record that contradicted petitioner’s own representations to the court. The post-conviction court rejected petitioner’s argument and denied the petition for relief. We affirm.
Petitioner was indicted on one count of third-degree rape and three counts of third-degree sexual abuse. Petitioner and his trial counsel signed a petition providing that petitioner would plead guilty to the third-degree rape charge and receive a downward…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lowry v. LaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Berg v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015