Legal Opinion

United States v. Uhlmann Grain Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 18, 1936No. 5566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

The government appeals from a judgment ordering the refund to the taxpayer of certain sums paid under protest upon assessment for stamp taxes. It raises the question of whether or not certain transactions known in the parlance of the Board of Trade as “accommodation trades” or “position loans” are sales, agreements of sale, or agreements to sell, and as such, subject to the excise tax levied under section 800, et seq., Schedule A (4) of the Revenue Act of 1926, 44 Stat. 101, 26 U.S. C.A. § 901 (4), now 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 903, 921(b) (2), and § 900 note.1

There is no dispute…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Provost v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Dupont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. A. B. Leach & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  2. F. S. Lewis & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API