Legal Opinion

Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

District Court, D. Montana

Decided November 4, 1958No. 633PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Chief Judge.

This cause came on regularly to be heard on the 16th and 17th days of July,, 1958, plaintiff appearing by and through its attorneys of record, P. L. MacDonald' and R. Lewis Brown, Jr., and defendants, appearing by and through their attorneys of record David L. Holland and Harold C. Heiss.

Evidence, both oral and documentary, was submitted and received, and the Court now being fully advised in the premises from the legal evidence introduced, the stipulations of the parties, the admissions in the pleadings, and the legal arguments, makes and orders filed its Findings of Fact…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Company v. Brotherhood Of Locomotive Firemen And EnginemenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United Railroad Workers Division of Transport Workers Union of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  3. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API