Legal Opinion
Bergstein v. Jordache Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 24, 1991No. 90 Civ. 1461 (JMC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CANNELLA, District Judge:
Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint is granted in part and denied in part. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).
BACKGROUND
In April 1982, Jordache Enterprises, Inc., [“Jordache”] a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New York, engaged David Bergstein, a Pennsylvania domiciliary, to be its sales representative in Western Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Bergstein agreed to develop accounts among clothing retailers within his territory and in return Jordache promised to pay him a five percent commission on all goods shipped…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1992
- Derthick v. Bassett-Walker, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1995
- Bergstein v. Jordache Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994