Legal Opinion

Matthew J. Pease v. Securities & Exchange Commission; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority; Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc.; John Brda; and Gregory McCabe

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided January 30, 2026No. 7:24-cv-00322Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION MATTHEW J. PEASE, § Plaintiff, § § v. MO:24-CV-00322-DC-RCG § SECURITIES & EXCHANGE § COMMISSION; FINANCIAL § INDUSTRY REGULATORY § AUTHORITY; NEXT BRIDGE § HYDROCARBONS, INC.; JOHN § BRDA; and GREGORY MCCABE; § Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Securities and Exchange Commission’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 35).1 This case is before the undersigned through a Standing Order pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

and…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API