Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 26, 1988No. 85-1569PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pincham

This action was brought by Porfirio Diaz to recover damages for personal injuries he sustained when he was struck by a car driven by defendant Robert Ward. Diaz joined the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) as a defendant, alleging, inter alia, that the CTA bus driver, Gant Kacija, was negligent in allowing Diaz to alight from the CTA bus at other than a normal bus stop and that as a result Diaz was struck by defendant Ward’s car. The jury rendered a verdict for Diaz in the amount of $800,000, apportioning 78% of the negligence to Diaz, 20% of the negligence to the CTA and 2% of the negligence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ney v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Barreto v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Frankenthal v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Fedt v. Oak Lawn Lodge, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arthur v. CatourIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Baker v. HutsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Masotti v. ConsoleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Antol v. Chavez-PeredaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Soderquist v. St. Charles Mall Associates, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API