Legal Opinion

Munzesheimer & Klein v. N. K. Fairbanks & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1891No. 3192PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Bowie. Tried below before Hon. E. W. Terhune, Judge of the Eighth Judicial District, exchanging with Judge John L. Sheppard, Judge of Fifth Judicial District.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Associate Justice.

The only assignment of error in this cause is, that “the court erred in overruling appellants’ objections to being required to amend and in rendering judgment in this cause, .because no regular term nor any legal special term of the District Court was in session.”

Delivered November 27, 1891.

It is shown by a bill of exceptions that a special term of the District Court of Bowie County had been ordered by the judge of the district to which that county belongs. At the time named for holding the special term the presiding judge of that district was engaged in holding a…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eucaline Medicine Co. v. Standard Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Ex Parte HolmesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Marx v. WeirCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Currie v. DobbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. SwinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API