Legal Opinion

Anderson v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT FOR ZONING

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 1996No. 94CA2209PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Chief Judge STERNBERG.

Plaintiffs, Donald and Mary Lee Anderson, appeal the order of the trial court upholding a decision of the defendant Board of Adjustment for Zoning Appeals of the City and County of Denver (the Board). That decision allowed defendants Richard and Emi-lene Kaufman to install an automated car wash on their non-conforming filling station property. Plaintiffs also appeal the trial court’s order concluding that their declaratory judgment suit was frivolous and groundless. We reverse.

Plaintiffs own an apartment building located adjacent to property on which the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gramiger v. CrowleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. Township of Chartiers v. William H. Martin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Humana, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUST. OF CITY OF LAKEWOODSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. Hartley v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Bird v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Eason v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF BOULDERColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Save Park County v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Jackson & Co.(USA), Inc. v. Town of AvonColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Fire House Car Wash, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment for Zoning AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. TRAILER HAVEN MHP, LLC v. City of AuroraColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API