Legal Opinion

Dodson v. Wilkinson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 24, 2008No. 06-4136UnpublishedCited by 164 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.

In a complaint filed against various Ohio State Corrections Officials, prisoner Ricardo Dodson alleged that delays in testing and treatment for Hepatitis C violated his Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights and constituted deliberate indifference to his need for medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Because we find no constitutional violations, we affirm the district court’s decision.

I

Ricardo Dodson, an inmate at the Rich-land Correctional…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. Lewis Rhinehart v. Debra ScuttCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Craig Wilson v. Mark WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. O'Brien v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Jones v. City of BrunswickDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  5. Adam M. Glowka v. Warren County Child Support Enforcement Agency, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API