Legal Opinion

Catt v. Olivier

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 27, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Hustings Oourt of the city of Staunton, pronounced February II, 1899, in the chancery suit of The William Knable & Co. Manufacturing Co. and Others v. The Wesleyan Female Institute and Others, in which the appellees filed their petition praying the cancellation of certain negotiable notes made by them, and an injunction to restrain tbe collection or disposition of said notes.

1Opinion of the Court

Bucilanan J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The controversy in this appeal is whether W. L. Olivier and twenty-five other parties who filed their petition in this cause are liable to the creditors of the Wesleyan Eemale Institute, an insolvent corporation, on certain notes made by them and now in the hands of Reeves Catt, the receiver of the court in this case. This question was referred to one of the commissioners •of the court for investigation. He reported the facts and circumstances under which the notes were made, and reached the conclusion that the makers of the notes were not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Ward v. ChurnSupreme Court of Virginia · 1868
  3. Woodward v. FosterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1868
  4. Nash v. FugateSupreme Court of Virginia · 1880
  5. Solenberger v. Gilbert's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Whitaker & Fowle v. LaneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Crafts v. Broadway National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. New York Life Insurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  4. Reliance Life Insurance v. Gulley's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  5. Blair v. Security BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API