Legal Opinion
Goral v. Kenney
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 17, 1991No. 9714PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant, Charles H. Kenney, appeals1 from a judgment rendered on a verdict for damages of $326,500 in favor of the plaintiff. The action arose out of the plaintiffs claim of dental malpractice by the defendant.
On appeal, the defendant asserts that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury that it was not to draw any adverse inference from the fact that the plaintiffs expert witness had previously been sued for malpractice, (2) charged the jury on the issue of informed consent, (3) concluded that the amount of the verdict was not excessive and (4) denied the defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Wade's Dairy, Inc. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- McKirdy v. CascioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Label Systems Corp. v. Samad AghamohammadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. GuckianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Eisenbach v. DowneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Preston v. Phelps Dodge Copper Products Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.