Legal Opinion

Fahey v. Gledhill

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1983No. L.A. 31549Published

1Opinion of the Court

33 Cal.3d 884 (1983)

663 P.2d 197

191 Cal. Rptr. 639

FRANK FAHEY, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

FRED GLEDHILL, Defendant and Respondent. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

FRED GLEDHILL, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 31549.

Supreme Court of California.

May 26, 1983.

COUNSEL

Richard P. MacNulty and Lewis D. Jones for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Wied, Granby, Alford & Arkin, C. Douglas Alford and Elaine L. Chan for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BROUSSARD, J.

Plaintiffs Frank Fahey and his insurer appeal from a judgment denying recovery for injury to Fahey's 50-foot yacht.

Fahey…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API