Legal Opinion

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. York

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1923No. 968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Appellees’ case rested on the following facts, duly pleaded by them:

On or about the 1st day of November, 1920, they were the owners of 10 bales of cotton at Trinidad, Henderson county, Tex. On that day they sold this cotton to a cotton buyer at Athens, Tex., conditional on delivering the cotton to him at Athens within 48 hours. Immediately after making this sale, they delivered the cotton to appellant’s agent at Trinidad, informing the agent of the conditions of their sale, ¿nd the necessity for immediate delivery of the cotton, and with knowledge of these facts appellant accepted the cotton…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gray v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Texas & New Orleans Railway Co. v. PullenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waller v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1978
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1978
  4. Waller v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. Friedman & LandauCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API