Fried v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, District Judge.
The facts and procedural history of this Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) action were detailed in our earlier opinion, Fried v. United States, 579 F.Supp. 1212 (N.D.Ill.1983). {“Fried I”), and will be briefly noted only to the extent that they bear upon the issues presently before us. In Fried I we held that the United States had sufficient control over the operation of Argonne National Laboratory (“ANL”) — the nuclear research facility where plaintiff Fried was allegedly injured — -to subject it to liability under Illinois law, thus bringing the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Thomas E. Bowen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fairchild Republic Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1988