Fairchild Republic Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STIEHL, District Judge:
Before the Court is third-party defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. In its second amended third-party complaint, Fairchild asks that the third-party defendants be held liable in indemnity or contribution for all or part of the amount which Catherine Baker, administratrix of the estate of Gea- rold Baker, received in settlement with Fairchild.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The original plaintiff, Gearold Baker, brought suit against Fairchild, alleging that he had incurred an asbestos-related disease as a result of his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Niemann v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1989