Legal Opinion

Fairchild Republic Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided November 17, 1988No. Cause 86-3318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STIEHL, District Judge:

Before the Court is third-party defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. In its second amended third-party complaint, Fairchild asks that the third-party defendants be held liable in indemnity or contribution for all or part of the amount which Catherine Baker, administratrix of the estate of Gea- rold Baker, received in settlement with Fairchild.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The original plaintiff, Gearold Baker, brought suit against Fairchild, alleging that he had incurred an asbestos-related disease as a result of his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Niemann v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API